Latest News

Ted Schaer and Leona Mogavero Recognized by 2026 Best Lawyers in America®

August 2025 • Source: Zarwin Baum

We are proud to share that two of our attorneys have once again been recognized among the nation’s leading legal professionals in the 32nd edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

  • Director Ted Schaer was honored for his work in Insurance Law and Personal Injury Litigation — his third consecutive year on the list.
  • Shareholder Leona Mogavero was recognized for her excellence in Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law.

Inclusion in Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review, with attorneys evaluated by fellow lawyers for their professional expertise and confirmed through a rigorous authentication process to ensure they are in current practice and in good standing.

About Best Lawyers
Founded over 40 years ago, Best Lawyers is the world’s most respected attorney ranking service, helping clients identify top legal talent across jurisdictions and practice areas. Its awards are published in leading local, regional, and national outlets worldwide.

We congratulate Ted and Leona on this well-deserved recognition and thank them for their continued dedication to excellence in serving our clients.

 

Twelve Gallagher Sharp Attorneys Recognized in the 2026 Edition of Best Lawyers®

August 2025 • Source: Gallagher Sharp LLP

Gallagher Sharp is proud to announce that twelve of our attorneys have been recognized in the 2026 edition of Best Lawyers®. We would like to especially congratulate Monica Sansalone on receiving this year’s “Lawyer of the Year” award for Legal Malpractice Law. The “Lawyer of the Year” accolades are reserved for one individual per practice area in each metropolitan region, based on the highest aggregate peer feedback. This designation represents a rare and distinguished honor.

Congratulations to all the 2026 winners!

The Best Lawyers in America®

About Best Lawyers
Since it was first published in 1983, Best Lawyers® has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence. Best Lawyers recognitions are compiled based on an exhaustive Purely Peer Review® evaluation. More than 184,000 industry leading lawyers are eligible to vote (from around the world) and submitted more than 25.8 million evaluations on the legal abilities of other lawyers based on their specific practice areas around the world.  For the 2026 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®, more than 23 million votes were analyzed, which resulted in more than 80,000 leading lawyers included in the edition. Lawyers are not required nor allowed to pay a fee to be listed; therefore, inclusion in Best Lawyers is considered a singular honor. To learn more about Best Lawyers and see the full list of 2026 award recipients, please visit bestlawers.com.

 

Pappas Grubbs Price PC Attends MABATx Foundation Dinner

August 2025 • Source: Pappas Grubbs Price

On August 12, 2025, attorneys from Pappas Grubbs Price PC attended the 20th annual Mexican-American Bar Association of Texas Foundation Scholarship Dinner in Houston.

The dinner brought together Houston-area attorneys, judges, law students, and community leaders to raise funds for the MABATx Foundation’s scholarship program, which provides scholarships to first-generation Houston law students, and to recognize several guests for their service to the community. The event featured a performance by the University of Houston Mariachi Band and a delicious meal, creating a memorable evening of celebration and purpose.

Founded in 2006 by Benny Agosto, Jr., Partner at Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Agosto, Aziz & Stogner, the Mexican-American Bar Association of Texas Foundation is dedicated to fostering social, economic, and educational progress. The foundation supports these goals by awarding scholarships, honoring trailblazers within the community, and promoting civic leadership and engagement.

Pictured left to right: Steven O. GrubbsBryce Y. FranklinAlma J. AguirreSamuel PerezVictor L. Cardenas Jr.

 

What Are the Penalties for Failing to Comply with OSHA Standards in Texas?

August 2025 • Source: Pappas Grubbs Price

OSHA standards

Texas employers are required to comply with the health and safety standards set by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). By strictly adhering to all applicable OSHA standards and regulations – which vary based on industry and company size – employers can not only create a safer workplace, but they can minimize their exposure to heavy financial penalties. 

Penalties for Violations

Penalties vary based on the type of violation, its severity and the likelihood that it will cause harm, among other factors. Generally, violations are categorized as “serious,” “other-than-serious,” “willful” or “repeated.” 

“Serious” and “Other-than-Serious” Violations

For 2025, the maximum penalty for a serious or other-than-serious violation is $16,550 per violation. The same maximum penalty applies for failure to adhere to OSHA’s posting requirements. Further, employers who are cited for a violation can be assessed $16,550 per day for every day that the hazard is not corrected beyond the abatement deadline. 

Minimum penalties for an other-than-serious violation or failure to meet the posting requirements can be as low as $0, while penalties for serious violations start at $1,221 per violation. 

In assessing where a particular offense falls within the penalty range, OSHA looks at the gravity of the violation, among other factors. A high-gravity violation is one that has both a high level of severity and a high probability of causing harm.  

Willful or Repeated Violations

For willful or repeated violations, the maximum penalty jumps to $165,514 per violation. The minimum penalty for violations in these categories is $11,823. 

In the case of a repeated other-than-serious violation, which otherwise would have no initial penalty, a penalty of $472 would be proposed for the first repeat violation. This would climb to $1,182 for the second repeated violation and $2,364 for a third repetition.

Discounts for Small Businesses, Clean Records and Fast Abatements

For certain violations and circumstances, OSHA provides discounts of up to 70% off standard penalty rates for smaller companies, a 15% reduction for companies that fix a hazard quickly and a 20% discount for companies with a clean record. 

Businesses with 25 or fewer employees may be eligible for a 70% penalty reduction. A 30% reduction may be offered to companies with between 26 and 100 employees, while employers with 101 to 250 workers may be granted a 10% reduction. 

Additionally, a 15% reduction is available for employers who correct a hazard within five days of discovery (they may be awarded 10 additional days if they contact their OSHA Compliance Safety and Health Officer within the first five days and explain their corrective action and why they need the additional time). 

Further, employers who have never been inspected by federal OSHA or an OSHA state plan, or who have been inspected in the past five years with no serious, repeat, willful or failure-to-abate violations, can qualify for a 20% penalty reduction.

Reductions are not available when the penalties are assessed for high-gravity serious, willful or repeated violations, or for failure to abate a hazardous situation.  

Compliance Is Key

The best way to avoid costly penalties is to maintain strict compliance with all OSHA regulations and standards that apply to your workplace. OSHA compliance is a complex, ongoing process that involves an understanding of which standards apply to your company; implementing appropriate health and safety programs and procedures; training employees; maintaining proper documentation; and performing regular safety audits to identify and correct any problem areas. By meeting all of your obligations under OSHA, you can minimize the risk of costly penalties while helping to keep your workers safe and healthy. 

The OSHA lawyers at Pappas Grubbs Price PC assist employers with the complex OSHA compliance process and help clients assert their rights throughout the OSHA inspection process. With offices in Houston, Dallas, Austin and San Antonio, our OSHA defense lawyers have successfully represented hundreds of clients in OSHA investigations and litigation, and we are able to perform 24/7 rapid response on-site coordination with our clients, often arriving before the OSHA inspector. For assistance with your OSHA matter, contact Pappas Grubbs Price.

 

Andrew Kaye Obtains Summary Judgment In Supreme Court, Kings County On “Threshold” In Multiple Surgery Case

August 2025 • Source: Gallo Vitucci Klar LLP

Plaintiff, who was 56 years-of-age at the time of the accident, alleged to have sustained a significant low back injury when his vehicle came into contact with our client’s tractor-trailer. As a result, plaintiff underwent multiple low back surgeries, leaving him unable to work and in need of a walking device.

With coverage well into the millions of dollars, this claim posed a significant risk for our clients. In an effort to mitigate that risk, the parties mediated. However, mediation proved unsuccessful, necessitating our motion for summary judgment. Through the motion, we sought dismissal under New York’s Insurance Law § 5102(d). Using carefully secured deposition testimony, medical records and expert affidavits, we are argued plaintiff’s debilitating injuries were not caused by the accident and therefore, were not “serious injuries” within the meaning of the statute.

In opposition, plaintiff submitted multiple affidavits. In our reply, we highlighted numerous flaws in the affidavits, arguing the evidence upon which plaintiff opposed the motion was legally inadequate to overcome our prima facie entitlement to dismissal. The Court obviously found our position availing and dismissed plaintiff’s claim.

Although largely academic, as part of this motion, we also successfully obtained dismissal on behalf of truck’s owner pursuant to the Grave’s Amendment. This decision then led to the Court changing the venue of the case from Kings County to Sullivan County, which was another application made within the motion.

 
<< first < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > last >>

Page 2 of 39